China Is No Green Energy Darling

Introduction

In one of his first actions as president, Joe Biden signed an executive order suspending new oil and gas leases on federal lands and reviewing existing operations.1 The alleged purpose was to restore balance to public lands operations and ensure the United States met its climate and clean energy goals.2 Nearly four years later, President Trump’s day-one executive order halted new renewable energy leasing on federal lands and waters to review “the questions in fact, law, and policy they raise.”3

The subjective and unilateral decision by the Biden administration and the seemingly retaliatory move by the Trump administration symbolize the fundamental problems with U.S. energy policy. Resource and technology biases, policy favoritism, and regulatory pendulums that swing with party changes in the administration create uncertainty and distort well-functioning energy markets.

Despite these policy warts, American companies are global leaders in energy production and world-class innovators. Although the order of importance may differ, policymakers across the political spectrum have shared goals: Increasing energy reliability and security, making environmental progress, and out-competing China.

Policymakers must be realistic about China on multiple fronts. China is no green energy darling. The country produces and consumes massive amounts of fossil fuels, particularly coal, without adequately deploying pollution control technologies. The country has a terrible environmental record and is by far the world’s largest carbon dioxide emitter.4 At the same time, China has strategically positioned itself to dominate clean energy markets by whatever means possible. Whether in solar photovoltaics, critical minerals processing, or nuclear energy, China has aggressively built out clean energy capabilities and is expanding investments worldwide. The PRC has also done a brilliant job at public relations, notably through its presence at the annual COP meeting, positioning itself as the planet’s green savior.

Increasing energy affordability and security, empowering American-led innovation, and outperforming China require durable policy reforms. These reforms should open markets, reduce barriers to technological progress, modernize regulations, and support private and public innovation pipelines. Unleashing the private sector to meet our energy needs and environmental ambitions will maintain and expand America’s economic and geopolitical leverage as an energy-dominant country.

Federal Critical Minerals Investments Need a Cost-Benefit Test

Last week, the Trump Administration announced more than $2 billion in new federal money for battery and critical minerals companies. The largest piece was a $1.4 billion loan to the silicon-anode battery maker Sila Nanotechnologies, alongside smaller deals for a scandium mine, a rare-earth-free magnet maker, a direct government ownership stake in a bauxite company, and grants for mining schools. It is the latest in a long series of federal investments; by the administration’s own count, it has signed or approved minerals deals worth nearly $40 billion since taking office.

We Know How to Reduce Wildfire Risk. Policy Is Standing in the Way

Over the past few weeks, smoky skies have spread across the United States and Canada. From the Canadian fires that pushed the Northeast and Great Lakes air quality to dangerous levels last month to the fires burning in the Northwest today, there seems to be no end in sight. The need to reduce fire risk is apparent, and we know how to do so through active forest management. Yet policy continues to slow those efforts down and that urgently needs to change.

Federal Grid Reforms Pick the Right Route and the Wrong Builder

America’s power grid is really a patchwork of regional grids, each with their own operators, with few high-capacity lines connecting them. This fragmentation comes at a real cost for customers, who are often unable to access cheaper power available just across a state or regional border. The Department of Energy’s recent National Transmission Needs Study identifies several of these cases, where regions’ electricity costs would decline substantially if they were connected by a high-capacity transmission line. Providing these benefits to consumers, however, requires confronting not just the incentives that discourage utilities from building interregional lines, but the state laws that let incumbent monopolies control who builds them.

Our Highlights

Our work is driven by real impact. Explore our latest achievements in our Annual Report:

Digital Reach
0 m

total digital impressions across web and social media.

Newsletter Reach
0

total subscribers to our weekly newsletter. 

Appearances
0 +

total interviews on news shows. 

Digital Reach
0

average monthly website visits. 

Youtube Growth
0 %

increase in views of video testimonies, appearances, and discussions. 

Testimony
0 +

times our team presented testimony to the government. 

Insights, news, and analysis in your inbox.

When innovation leads, the planet wins. Free markets don’t just drive economic growth—they drive cleaner air, cleaner energy, and a cleaner future.

Search Here

Thank you for signing up

Help us promote sensible solutions for both planet and prosperity.

Meet Our Annual Impact Report.

Prosperity and conversation are too often treated as rivals. C3 exists to prove otherwise.

Read our latest annual report to see how C3 Solutions and our partners are advancing a better store: one where innovation, abundance, and stewardship move together.

Subscribe to our exclusive email designed for conservatives who care about climate.

Help us promote free market solutions for climate change.